Politics

Kenneth Tin-Kin Hung: Crypto-anti-Zionism? Crypto-anti-Semitism?

A (1) Passion play; in which the lead carries not a cross but rather a dollar sign made to resemble a (2) swastika; upon a floor tiled with (3) Stars of David; before a backdrop depicting (4) banking crises? Well, that's what Kenneth Tin-Kin Hung seems to have presented in his work In G.O.D. We Trust, on display through January 9, 2010, at Monique Meloche Gallery. Why?

Kenneth Tin-Kin Hung @ Monique Meloche

Hung is a collage artist; his collage is animated; colorful shapes pass across a singular wall-mounted video screen. And in that psychedelic motion, the most readily identifiable figure appears to be Hung's protagonist: President Barack Obama. It's through a series of graphic vignettes that Hung causes Obama to incarnate again-and-again as a prominent religious figure: Jesus, Buddha, Eshu [Nigerian], the Virgin Mary, Krishna, Mohammad, and finally Abraham. Sorry Moses!

One wonders how many consumers of Hung's work fixate upon the foreground, noticing only Obama. In fairness, the video's vivid hues and queer pace--if not also the smiling face of the President--are hypnotic. So that it's good to stop the action, examine a still frame, and ask: What is this fellow doing?



"Curators crowned kings of the art world: Artists relegated to also-rans in power list."

In the "I told you so" department, an article by Andy McSmith in The Independant, including the list of the top 100 most powerful people in the artworld.

"If you want clout in the art world in these recessionary times, you are better off putting pen to paper as a curator than paintbrush to canvas as a jobbing artist."

Continue reading here.



As Christi Nielson responded to Sherwin's latest great art post, "A colleague of mine once said 'they're trying to lock the doors to a building where walls no longer exist.' "

Sherwin on myartspaceblog:
I've read some buzz about the ArtPrize competition. A few art critics and NYC art dealers have called it a sign of desperation rather than an opportunity for artists-- implying that anyone who enters it is 'just desperate'. In fact, one critic of the competition-- András Szántó -- suggested that anyone who wins the competition will never be accepted in the mainstream art world.

András Szántó also suggested that the $400,000+ cash prize should have been donated to existing art programs or as grants to artists who are represented by notable galleries. He actually made the case that only a select few should dictate what is 'good' art or 'bad' art instead of the general public-- backing the idea that only certain individuals are capable of understanding or appreciating art.



house_of_cards.jpg

Elie Wiesel called him a "God." His investors called him a "genius." But, proving correct that old adage from the country and western song, you never really know what goes on behind closed doors.

Bernie Madoff, for at least 20 years, ran a Ponzi scheme on thousands of clients, among them the people you and I would consider the best and brightest. Business leaders, celebrities, charities, even some of his own relatives and his defense attorney were taken for a ride (this has to be the first time a lawyer was hosed by the client).

We're clearly in one of those historic, game changing years: up is down, red is blue and black is President. Aside from Obama himself, no person will provide a more iconic face of this end-of-capitalism-as-we-know-it year than Bernard Lawrence Madoff.

Which is too bad.



edburke.jpg

Look what Tyler found:

Chicago alderman: Look what I found...
Love this: A Chicago alderman is getting creative [via AJ] in trying to do something about the Art Institute of Chicago's 50 percent admissions increase. The alderman, Ed Burke, has found an 1891 agreement that might require the museum to be free to the public two-and-a-half-days per week. (That would get the AIC almost halfway to keeping up with its peer institutions.) Stay tuned here...



taxthresh3.png

The teabag rallies are over and millions thousands hundreds turned out to protest the return to Clinton-era tax rates in 2010. Pathetic.

So here's a simple plan to make all their heads explode, based on the simple idea that they worship Ronald Reagan: instead of returning to Clinton's top marginal rate of 38%, let's return to Reagan's top marginal rate of 50%.

Better yet, let's return to Nixon's top marginal rate of 75%. Or Eisenhower's top marginal rate of 91%.

These were all popular Republican presidents. So why don't we return to good old-fashioned Republican tax rates?




Stopping Old Bullets

G B-day 1965.jpgThat’s me with a group of my buddies at my birthday party on April 4, 1965. We were a group of rowdy, rough-edged little lads, but old enough to start wondering about important things in our country's history.



Similar to the totally unexpected collapse of Communism in the years around 1989, a complete rearrangement of the power structure in the world of fine art was announced today.

The rapid and unexpected collapse of the Communist systems of the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe continues to mystify scholars and citizens alike. A parallel phenomenon seems to have occurred today. All international, jet-set curators in a massive guilt-ridden attack of moral conscience have simultaneously renounced all claims to leading, directing or educating the artworld. They have decided to return to what they do best, if agonizingly --- fundraising, aperitifs and putting up with difficult artists. ...






levelofchange.jpg

Tom Tressor says on HuffPo, "The city that gave the United States a leader who called for change is seething with citizen anger over a laundry list of corruption, cronyism and crooked deals."

Isn't that also true of the Chicago artworld, and indeed the PoMo artworld in general now? How about using our new-found desire for change in our own backyard(s)? Regime change here now.



toonburns.gif

This wonderful comment by Stephen Colbert was brought to my attention by our Shark friend and foe, Art or Idiocy (yes I still read you Erik).

From The Colbert Report, Wednesday, September 24, 2008:

Stephen Colbert: Now why $700,000,000,000 exactly, when these days you can purchase a bank for 3 pounds of ground chuck and an old bicycle wheel? Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke explained...

Ben Bernanke: Just as when you sell a painting at Sotheby's you don't know... nobody knows what it is worth until the auction's over. Then people know what it's worth. I think it's the same thing.

Stephen Colbert: Art is an excellent analogy. Because I think a lot of people are looking at our economy right now and saying, "my five year old could have done that."




It's A New Day - will.i.am




Obamas.jpg

Why All Americans Have Reason to Celebrate
by Arianna Huffington




Carl Bernstein: McCain's Terrorist Buddy

On the eve of the debate wherein McCain is reputedly going to try for character assassination on Obama. McCain's own radical connections should be mentioned.

Read on.




Are You Better Off?

Interesting economic charts and info, here. Then vote. Courtesy of Academy Computer Services.

And chec out "African American Political Pundit" on Palin's Radical Connections here.



studio_museum.jpg

In a great post on his blog, photographer Dawoud Bey raises some very Sharkpack-like questions about how to circumvent the decided lack of appropriate institutional support:

"Within the past week here in Chicago there have been no less than two panel discussions on race and art production. More specifically these panel discussions (with vocal audience exchanges) looked at black art and black art production, or as yesterday's panel at the University of Chicago (in conjunction with the exhibition Black Is/Black Ain't) was entitled, "Post Black: There and Back Again." Thursday night's program at the Experimental Station, which was organized by Theaster Gates as part of the "Representations" series on culture, politics, and aesthetics, was entitled "Black Enough?"

Both of these gatherings were lively, engaging, and variously informative, and provided a much needed forum for the airing of ideas that usually take place away from the light of public discourse."



Chicago T-Shirt.jpg

I want to post ---as a blog --- a comment I put up over on Bad at Sports. I know most, yet not ALL of our two publics overlap. I was very enthused by the roundtable discussion Duncan MacKenzie and Lori Waxman had with Kathryn Hixson and James Yood.

They brought up some very important points, as did several commenters including Pedro Velez and our own Shark. ...



biology_pic1.jpg

Dear Mr. Shark,

We are delighted to tell you that you have been nominated for a Richard H. Driehaus Foundation Individual Artist Award, the first actual Shark to be thus uhhhmmmmm......'honored'



picasso01.jpg

As Paul Klein has publicized, the City Council is on the verge of passing an ordinance that is bad for Chicago, bad for its citizens and particularly bad for the art community. Sharkforum supports his attempt to organize a challenge to this action.

An alternative ordinance has been proposed that will not be considered unless you act. The following groups are involved: Sharkforum, Bad at Sports, the Chicago Artists Coalition, Lumpen, ArtLetter and others.



Dictatorship of the Consensoriat

shark_consensus_contract.jpg

I wish to introduce a new word and a new phrase into the international artworld dialogue. The Dictatorship of the Consensoriat. Please assist me by using it every chance you get. Forming neologisms is one of my favorite diversions, especially now that I have been learning Latin. It may be a slightly arcane hobby, but I enjoy it, and terminology can control far more of ones thought processes than we are often happy to admit — therefore, why not grab the bull by the horns and begin to develop our own phrases for what we feel it is necessary to discuss or critique. Shakespeare created words like amazement and radiance, which have become commonplace. These made-up words have stood the test of time because they expressed notions people wanted to articulate, and because they were understandable. Let's hope I can do something similar, if less inspired. In fact, Shakespeare, in his plays, sonnets, and poems, used approximately 17,677 different words —and of those 17,677 words, 1,700 were brand-new, coined by him.



destiny.jpg iraq.jpg














Two recent books make the same powerful case against the current administration in diametrically opposite ways.

“Destined for Destiny”
the Unauthorized Autobiography of George W. Bush

by Scott Dikkers and Peter Hilleren
pub. by Scribner, 167 pp., $19.95

“Out of Iraq”
by William Polk and George S. McGovern
pub. by Simon and Schuster, 143 pp., $15.00

It takes neither Sherlock Holmes, nor Dr. Watson, nor one of the Hounds of the Baskervilles to sniff out the foul stench that has come to comprise the American political debate. Two recent books make this point in different ways. “Destined for Destiny,” by Scott Dikkers and Peter Hilleren, and “Out of Iraq,” by George McGovern and William Polk offer, by turns, gut-busting and sobering views of our current malaise.



abc_lies.jpg

ABC, renowned for its blatant pro-Bush and anti-Kerry propaganda during the last election, including its link to the Sinclair Broadcasting group, those radical conservatives behind the Speed-Boat smear, is up to similar tricks with a perfectly-timed, patently bogus "docudrama" on the 9/11 tragedy.



caa_brandl_intro.jpg

Here's my thoroughly personal report from the conference in Boston. A bit looooong for a blog entry, but short considering all the activities at the conference.




The Unseen and the Unseemly

An old saying goes like this:
"What you don't know can't hurt you."

Another favorite amongst artists and pseudo-intellectuals goes something like this:
"What doesn't kill me makes me stronger."

Lately the news has me wondering.




Originally posted December 15, 2005 -- I attended a panel discussion the other day, "Local Engagement: Museum Curators Speak" which featured four "younger" curators (although they weren't all young, and some had been in their posts for a number of years) as part of the ongoing "Artists At Work" series sponsored by the Chicago Department of Cultural Affairs under Barbara Koenen's capable supervision. (Check out their excellent website, here,)




Patrick Fitzgerald, U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Illinois since 2001, gets the nod as The National Law Journal's 2005 Lawyer of the Year. Writes the mag's Leigh Jones, "No one else in 2005 roiled politics inside the Beltway and the media that feed on it like the prosecutor from Chicago, Patrick Fitzgerald."



OH! So THIS is What The "War on Christmas" Is All About!




«Photography  |   Main Index  |  Archives   |  Social Ills »