youshouldknow.gif
bblogo4.gif

Websters.gif

jkruthtolive.JPG
enginelogo.gif
eclectic_268.gif

sharkfunniesButton.gif

architrouve.gif

AlGoreButton.jpg

basbadge.gif



art

New Week, New Show
by Ursula Sokolowska

This Friday (1/11) @ Gallery 2
by Ursula Sokolowska


biz niz


comic art

Sharkforum Funnies 2
by Mark Staff Brandl

Sharkforum Funnies
by Mark Staff Brandl

Nu Pop Scape
by Mark Staff Brandl


film

Let's Rage
by Ursula Sokolowska


design

Horror Posters
by Simone Muench


humor

Your “New York Age”
by Mark Staff Brandl

Sharkforum Funnies 3
by Mark Staff Brandl


lit


local color


music

The Guitar Slinger
by The Shark


original fiction

Apathy
by Paul K


people


photo blogging

EELS
by KC Clarke

Dispatch From India
by John Kruth


photography

EELS
by KC Clarke

car repair
by Ursula Sokolowska


politics


sensible ideas

Chicago Art History
by Ursula Sokolowska

Calling All Sharks
by KC Clarke


social ills

Self-Reliance, A Thought
by Mark Staff Brandl


sport


the media


theatre


web gems


word of the day

ephebiphobia, n.
by Simone Muench

taphnophobia, n.
by Simone Muench

Dysphemism
by Simone Muench

lumen, n.
by Simone Muench

oleaginous, adj.
by Simone Muench

film

Until The Monkey Dies

OriginalKong.jpg
At once maddening and gloriously free and honorous of a mythical Hollywood past which may or may not have roots in reality, Peter Jackson's virtuoso remake of the 1933 classic "King Kong" offers everything for a movie lover to love (and everything for a curmudgeon to hate). Call me amiss, but I must cop to having never seen any of Jackson's "Lord of the Rings" films. Cast-of-Thousands spectaculars have always been distasteful to me. With "King Kong," it seems, Jackson has found a way to keep his megalithic special effects machine working full time whilst paying close attention to a simple plot line (albeit one written for him almost 80 years ago). The resultant film is everything one would expect from a $207 million budget.


The good news is that the story remains intact. The bad news is that the FX, as skillfully as they are employed, remain obtrusive, overwhelming and ultimately distracting. Then again, in a movie about star entertainment attraction --an oversized ape, -- unobtrusive FX would probably be deemed a failure as well. In this case Jackson, remaking a movie he says shaped his childhood and his desire to become a filmmaker, has found a balance as likely to be perfect as any a modern director could reach. The hard thing to get around is that Jackson's glittering Manhattan of the 1930's is envisioned (and then filmed) through eyes of the 21st century. The result is a curious blend of nostalgia and high-technology which, while never less than satisfying, remains always a bit unnatural and disorienting.

The plot should be well known to most readers. Maverick impressario/filmmaker Carl Denham manages to wrangle together a cast and crew to finish filming a movie on uncharted Skull Island and comes away with much more than expected. In addition to dinosaurs and massive insect populations there is an enormous simian worshipped by the locals. The 25-foot tall ape is captured and dragged back to Manhattan eventually falling in love with Denham's leading lady Ann Darrow and his infatuation leads to his downfall. As Denham, Jack Black is masterfully cast, his essential obnoxiousness and egomania working here in his favor. Adrien Brody as writer Jack Driscoll seems to be slumming, while Naomi Watts in the Fay Wray role gives her all and turns in a performance that goes a long way toward humanizing the CGI-animated gorilla and imbueing him with a sympathetic aspect. It becomes obvious that Kong is not trying to abduct Ann, he is trying to protect her from the barbarous humans they are beset with on all sides. What Jackson has over the makers of the original "King Kong" (we won't talk about the Jeff Bridges/ Jessica Lange version here), Merion Cooper and animator Willis O'Brien, comes via two powerfurl weapons: a cast that is superior in every way to the original cast; and a most sophisticated sense of how to integrate high-tech visuals into an ostensibly old-fashioned story. And by the time he is finished pulling off this amazing feat Jackson has made it look like the endeavor was effortless, like it was easy. The director demonstrates an ease and a mastery that is rare, associated most recently with Spielberg and Sinatra. Three hours plus may be a bit long for a meditation on the exploitative nature of show biz, but this version of "Kong" does it with considerable style.

| More Blogs by Paul K | Email Paul K

Comments

The original is one of my all time favorite movies. I approached this with a fair amount of worry that it was going to, well, suck. I had seen the previews and the look was wonderful, but, it could still, well, suck.

There is a depth to this film that didn't exist in the original. I'm not sure which I prefer (I want to watch this again when it comes out on DVD) but I thought it was darn wonderful. My only (mild) disagreement with your comments ...

Naomi Watts was wonderful, but she's no Fay Wray (of course you have to realize that I am completely unreasonable when it comes to Fay Wray, so mileage may vary)

I'm really enjoying your writing here. Glad that Dave sent the link to the email list.

Eric


Post a comment

Notes on posting:
If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.

We appreciate dialogue and commentary, but we encourage you to use your full name, as we do. Please be advised that we're less likely to post your comment if you use only your first name or an alias.
Additionally, personal attacks and pointless flaming will not be tolerated. If you'd like to be a part of our conversation please make your points in an intelligent and respectful manner.
We don't insist on everyone agreeing, but we do insist on civility.
Have at it.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.sharkforum.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2474

« PREVIOUS | HOME | NEXT »


(c) and TM 2007 Sharkforum and the Sharkpack
All blog post texts are (c) 2007 the individual authors. World rights reserved.
betabottom.jpg
gimmemore.gif

by Ursula Sokolowska

by Mark Staff Brandl

by Ursula Sokolowska

by Ursula Sokolowska

by Ursula Sokolowska

by Ursula Sokolowska

by KC Clarke

by Ursula Sokolowska

by Mark Staff Brandl

by Mark Staff Brandl

by Mark Staff Brandl

by David Amram
Kristy Odelius and the Guild Complex
by Simone Muench





Biz


CONTACT SHARKFORUM





movabletype.gif
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2
movabletypeID.gif



link-cb.gif



apple.jpg

Made on a Mac





fin